نشریه پژوهش های نوین فیزیک
دوره 10، شماره 1 - ( بهار و تابستان 1404 )
جلد 10 شماره 1 صفحات 26-14 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Usefi M, Banaee N, HassanPpour S, Khazaee Moghadam M. Investigation and Comparison of Dose Distribution Between the Convolution Algorithm and Monte Carlo Simulation in the Gamma Knife Device for Brain Tumor Treatment. JMRPh 2025; 10 (1) :14-26
URL: http://jmrph.khu.ac.ir/article-1-259-fa.html
URL: http://jmrph.khu.ac.ir/article-1-259-fa.html
یوسفی مصطفی، بنائی نوشین، حسن پور سهیل، خزاعی مقدم مریم. بررسی و مقایسه توزیع دز حاصل از الگوریتم کانوولوشن و شبیه‌سازی مونت‌کارلو در دستگاه گامانایف در درمان تومورهای مغزی. نشریه پژوهش های نوین فیزیک. 1404; 10 (1) :14-26
گروه مهندسی هسته ای، مهندسی پرتوپزشکی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
چکیده: (69 مشاهده)
سرطان یکی از چالش‌های بزرگ بشری است که نیاز به روش‌های درمانی دقیق و مؤثر دارد. در این راستا، تکنیک‌های نوین مانند استریوتاکتیک رادیوسرجری و دستگاه‌های پیشرفته مانند گامانایف برای درمان تومورهای مغزی به کار می‌روند. الگوریتم کانوولوشن به دلیل توانایی در تشخیص ناهمگنی بافت و شبیه‌سازی مونت‌کارلو به عنوان دقیق‌ترین روش محاسبه دز، مورد توجه قرار دارند. در این مطالعه، دستگاه گامانایف با استفاده از کد مونت‌کارلو شبیه‌سازی شد و توزیع دز بر روی یک فانتوم ناهمگن محاسبه گردید. سپس، این فانتوم تحت تصویربرداری سی‌تی قرار گرفت و در سیستم گامانایف تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که در میانه پروفایل دز، اختلاف توزیع دز کم است، اما در حاشیه‌ها افزایش می‌یابد. این مطالعه به بهبود دقت درمانی و کاهش عوارض جانبی کمک می‌کند.
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
تخصصي
دریافت: 1403/12/25 | پذیرش: 1404/6/12 | انتشار: 1404/6/31 | انتشار الکترونیک: 1404/6/31
دریافت: 1403/12/25 | پذیرش: 1404/6/12 | انتشار: 1404/6/31 | انتشار الکترونیک: 1404/6/31
فهرست منابع
1. 1[ Delaidelli, A. and A. Moiraghi, Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumors. Brain sciences, 14(3): p. 224, 2024. [DOI:10.3390/brainsci14030224] [PMID] []
2. [2] Mellinghoff, I.K. and R.J. Gilbertson, Brain Tumors: Challenges and Opportunities to Cure. J Clin Oncol, 35(21): p. 2343-2345, 2017. [DOI:10.1200/JCO.2017.74.2965] [PMID]
3. [3] Lara-Velazquez, M., et al., Advances in brain tumor surgery for glioblastoma in adults. Brain sciences, 7(12): p. 166, 2017. [DOI:10.3390/brainsci7120166] [PMID] []
4. [4] Tsugawa, T., et al., Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial hemangiopericytoma. Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT, 3(1): p. 29, 2014.
5. [5] Anvari, A., P. Sasanpour, and M.R. Kheradmardi, Radiotherapy and immunotherapy in melanoma brain metastases. Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy, 2021.
6. [6] Higuchi, Y., et al., Modern management for brain metastasis patients using stereotactic radiosurgery: literature review and the authors' gamma knife treatment experiences. Cancer management and research,: p. 1889-1899 , 2018. [DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S116718] [PMID] []
7. [7] Kamal, S., Gamma Knife Radiosurgery-A Revolutionary Modality in the Treatment of Brain Tumors. National Journal of Health Sciences, 7(4): p. 142-143, 2022. [DOI:10.21089/njhs.74.0142]
8. [8] Ashley Cothran, R., Hypofractionated radiation: Understanding the modality and impact on patient outcomes. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 26(1): p. 23-26, 2022.
9. [9] Zhan, D.-J., et al. Multi-group Particle Swarm Optimization with K-means Gap Filling for Finding Gamma Knife Treatment Plans. in 2023 13th International Conference on Information Science and Technology (ICIST). IEEE, 2023. [DOI:10.1109/ICIST59754.2023.10367177]
10. [10] Xing, L., et al., Overview of image-guided radiation therapy. Medical Dosimetry, 31(2): p. 91-112, 2006. [DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2005.12.004] [PMID]
11. [11] Podgorsak, E.B., et al., Radiosurgery with high energy photon beams: a comparison among techniques. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 16(3): p. 857-865, 1989. [DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(89)90506-3] [PMID]
12. [12] Rice, R., et al., Measurements of dose distributions in small beams of 6 MV x-rays. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 32(9): p. 1087, 1987. [DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/32/9/002] [PMID]
13. [13] Stoica, F., R. Perin, and D. Neamtu, RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR LARGE SKULL BASE BENIGN MENINGIOMAS. Romanian Neurosurgery, 38, 2024. [DOI:10.33962/roneuro-2024-134]
14. [14] Zhu, D., et al., Study of a spherical phantom for Gamma knife dosimetry. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 11(2): p. 222-229, 2010. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v11i2.3130] [PMID] []
15. [15] Nakazawa, H., et al., Effect of skull contours on dose calculations in Gamma Knife Perfexion stereotactic radiosurgery. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 15(2): p. 28-38, 2014. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4603] [PMID] []
16. [16] Khan, F.M. and J.P. Gibbons, Khan's the physics of radiation therapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.
17. [17] Zhang, P., et al., Fast verification of Gamma Knife™ treatment plans. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 1(4): p. 158-164, 2000. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v1i4.2638] [PMID] []
18. [18] Xu, A., et al., Dose differences between the three dose calculation algorithms in Leksell GammaPlan. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 15(5): p. 89-99, 2014. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4844] [PMID] []
19. [19] Zhang, A., et al., Comprehensive evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 14(2): p. 127-145, 2013. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4062] [PMID] []
20. [20] Chaikh, A., J.-Y. Giraud, and J. Balosso, A method to quantify and assess the dosimetric and clinical impact resulting from the heterogeneity correction in radiotherapy for lung cancer. International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology, 2(1), 2014. [DOI:10.14319/ijcto.0201.10]
21. [21] Fultz, S., et al., Photoneutron cross sections for V 51 and Co 59. Physical Review, 128(5): p. 2345, 1962. [DOI:10.1103/PhysRev.128.2345]
22. [22] Sloboda, R.S., et al., A brief look at model-based dose calculation principles, practicalities, and promise. Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 9(1): p. 79-88, 2017. [DOI:10.5114/jcb.2017.65849] [PMID] []
23. [23] Schreuder, A.N., et al., Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 20(10): p. 160-171, 2019. [DOI:10.1002/acm2.12733] [PMID] []
24. [24] Ahnesjö, A., M. Saxner, and A. Trepp, A pencil beam model for photon dose calculation. Medical physics, 19(2): p. 263-273, 1992. [DOI:10.1118/1.596856] [PMID]
25. [25] Ahnesjö, A. and M.M. Aspradakis, Dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 44(11): p. R99, 1999. [DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/44/11/201] [PMID]
26. [26] Lu, W., et al., Accurate convolution/superposition for multi-resolution dose calculation using cumulative tabulated kernels. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 50(4): p. 655, 2005. [DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/50/4/007] [PMID]
27. [27] Elmtalab, S., et al., Determination of the neutron contamination during brain radiotherapy using a moderated-boron trifluoride detector and the Mcnp Monte Carlo code. Radiation protection dosimetry, 198(3): p. 129-138, 2022. [DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncac001] [PMID]
28. [28] Aziz, M.A., et al., -Beam Neutron Optimization for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) facility. Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, 57(4): p. 17-26, 2024. [DOI:10.21608/ajnsa.2024.304087.1830]
29. [29] Shende, R., S. Dhoble, and G. Gupta, Dosimetric Evaluation of Radiation Treatment Planning for Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique Using Monte Carlo Simulation. Journal of Medical Physics, 48(3): p. 298-306, 2023. [DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_4_23] [PMID] []
30. [30] Raghavi, S., et al., Evaluation of Dose Calculation Algorithms Accuracy for ISOgray Treatment Planning System in Motorized Wedged Treatment Fields. Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors, 14(10): p. 31, 2024. [DOI:10.4103/jmss.jmss_28_24] [PMID] []
31. [31] Chetty, I.J., et al., Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo‐based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Medical physics, 34(12): p. 4818-4853, 2007. [DOI:10.1118/1.2795842] [PMID]
32. [32] Jia, X., et al., GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation for radiotherapy dose calculation. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 56(22): p. 7017, 2011. [DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/56/22/002] [PMID]
33. [33] Han, T., et al., Dosimetric comparison of Acuros XB deterministic radiation transport method with Monte Carlo and model‐based convolution methods in heterogeneous media. Medical Physics, 38(5): p. 2651-2664, 2011. [DOI:10.1118/1.3582690] [PMID] []
34. [34] Junios, K.D., Treatment planning system pada kanker prostat dengan teknik brachyterapy. Jurnal Ipteks Terapan, 10(3): p. 155-160, 2016. [DOI:10.22216/jit.2016.v10i3.587]
35. [35] Trnka, J., J. Novotny Jr, and J. Kluson, MCNP‐based computational model for the Leksell Gamma Knife. Medical physics, 34(1): p. 63-75, 2007. [DOI:10.1118/1.2401054] [PMID]
36. [36] Al-Dweri, F.M., A.M. Lallena, and M. Vilches, A simplified model of the source channel of the Leksell GammaKnife® tested with PENELOPE. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 49(12): p. 2687, 2004. [DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/49/12/015] [PMID]
37. [37] Xiong, W., et al. Implementation of Monte Carlo simulations for the Gamma Knife system. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2007. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/74/1/021023]
38. [38] Reinhardt, S., et al., Comparison of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 films for clinical photon and proton beams. Medical physics, 39(8): p. 5257-5262, 2012. [DOI:10.1118/1.4737890] [PMID]
39. [39] Costa, F., S. Sarmento, and O. Sousa, Assessment of clinically relevant dose distributions in pelvic IOERT using Gafchromic EBT3 films. Physica Medica, 31(7): p. 692-701, 2015. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.05.013] [PMID]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |