The Journal Of Modern Research Physics, affiliated with the Faculty of Physics, Kharazmi University, is committed to maintaining the highest standards of research integrity and publication ethics. The journal adheres to the guidelines and standards of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and complies with the relevant Iranian laws, regulations, and guidelines concerning research ethics and the prevention and combating of scientific misconduct.
Any violation of research and publication ethics—including plagiarism, fabrication or falsification of data, duplicate publication, simultaneous submission, inappropriate citation, manipulation of the peer-review process, and other forms of research misconduct—will be investigated in accordance with the journal’s policies and applicable ethical guidelines. Such violations may result in rejection of the manuscript, termination of the review process, correction or retraction of a published article, and other appropriate measures.
The publisher is committed to supporting the journal in maintaining high standards of publication ethics and academic integrity.
Submitted manuscripts are subject to an initial assessment regarding their relevance to the journal’s scope, compliance with formal requirements, originality, and potential plagiarism or other forms of misconduct.
The peer-review process is conducted in a specialized, confidential, and impartial manner.
Final publication decisions are made by the Editor-in-Chief and/or the Editorial Board based on the scientific quality and ethical standards of the manuscript.
The publisher and editorial team are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and related information.
Allegations of research or publication misconduct are investigated in accordance with the journal’s policies, applicable regulations, and COPE guidelines.
Appropriate measures are taken when serious ethical violations or errors are identified, including correction, retraction, or withdrawal of articles when necessary.
Editorial decisions are based on the scientific quality, originality, methodological soundness, relevance, and significance of the submitted manuscript.
Manuscripts are evaluated without discrimination based on the authors’ gender, nationality, ethnicity, institutional affiliation, religion, or other personal characteristics.
Editors must maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and must not disclose information about them to unauthorized persons.
Editors must identify and appropriately manage actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest.
Editors must ensure that suspected cases of plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, duplicate publication, or other forms of misconduct are appropriately investigated.
When significant errors or ethical concerns are identified after publication, editors should take appropriate action, including issuing corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions, as necessary.
Reviewers play an essential role in maintaining the scientific quality and integrity of the journal.
Reviewers must treat all manuscripts and information obtained during the review process as strictly confidential.
Reviews should be conducted objectively, fairly, and within the requested timeframe.
Reviewers should provide clear, constructive, and evidence-based comments that can assist authors in improving their manuscripts.
Reviewers must not use unpublished information obtained through the review process for personal or professional benefit.
Reviewers should declare any actual, potential, or perceived conflict of interest before accepting a review assignment.
Reviewers should inform the editorial office of any suspected plagiarism, data manipulation, duplicate publication, or other ethical concerns identified in the manuscript.
Reviewers should avoid personal criticism of authors and should base their evaluations solely on the scientific content of the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for ensuring the scientific and ethical integrity of their submitted work.
Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, analysis, or interpretation of the research.
All listed authors must approve the final version of the manuscript and agree to its submission for publication.
The corresponding author is responsible for obtaining the necessary approval from all co-authors and for communicating with the journal throughout the submission and publication process.
Submitted manuscripts must constitute original work and must not have been previously published or simultaneously submitted to another journal.
Authors must appropriately acknowledge and cite the sources of ideas, data, text, figures, and other materials obtained from previous works.
Authors must not fabricate, falsify, manipulate, or selectively report research data or results.
Any substantial overlap with previously published or submitted work must be clearly disclosed to the journal.
Authors should avoid inappropriate or excessive self-citation and any form of citation manipulation.
All actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest must be disclosed.
Authors are responsible for promptly notifying the journal if they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published article and should cooperate with the editorial office in correcting the record when necessary.
The journal considers plagiarism and other forms of research misconduct to be serious violations of academic and publication ethics.
The following practices are unacceptable:
Using another person’s ideas, words, data, figures, or other intellectual work without appropriate acknowledgment or citation;
Fabrication or falsification of research data or results;
Manipulation or inappropriate alteration of research materials or results;
Duplicate or redundant publication;
Simultaneous submission of the same manuscript to more than one journal;
Inappropriate or manipulative citation practices;
Manipulation or interference with the peer-review process; and
Any other form of research or publication misconduct.
Suspected cases will be investigated in accordance with the journal’s policies, applicable regulations, and relevant COPE guidelines.
A conflict of interest may be actual, potential, or perceived and may arise from financial, personal, professional, academic, institutional, or other relationships that could influence—or reasonably be perceived to influence—the objectivity of the research, review, or editorial decision-making process.
Authors, reviewers, editors, and other individuals involved in the publication process are expected to disclose any relevant conflict of interest.
The corresponding author is responsible for completing and submitting the required Conflict of Interest Form on behalf of the authors.
All information related to submitted manuscripts, including the manuscript itself, reviewers’ comments, editorial correspondence, and unpublished research findings, must be treated as confidential.
Editors and reviewers must not disclose or use unpublished information obtained through the editorial or peer-review process for personal, academic, or professional purposes without appropriate authorization.
The journal is committed to maintaining the accuracy and integrity of the published scientific record.
When significant errors, inaccuracies, ethical concerns, or evidence of misconduct are identified after publication, the journal may take appropriate action, including:
publishing a correction;
publishing an expression of concern;
retracting the article; or
withdrawing the article when justified by the circumstances.
Such actions will be taken in accordance with the journal’s policies, applicable regulations, and relevant COPE guidelines.
Authors remain fully responsible for the content, accuracy, originality, data, analysis, references, and conclusions presented in their manuscripts, regardless of whether artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been used during the preparation of the manuscript.
AI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors. Where the use of AI tools has made a substantial contribution to the preparation of a manuscript, such use should be transparently disclosed in accordance with the journal’s policies and applicable publication-ethics standards.
The use of AI tools does not relieve authors of their responsibility to verify the accuracy and originality of the submitted content and to ensure that no confidential, copyrighted, or sensitive information is improperly disclosed or used.
The corresponding author is required to complete and submit the relevant declaration forms requested by the journal, including the Conflict of Interest Form and Author Declaration Form.
By submitting these forms, the authors confirm, as applicable, that:
the manuscript is original;
the manuscript has not been previously published;
the manuscript is not simultaneously under consideration by another journal;
all listed authors have approved the submitted version;
sources and contributions have been appropriately acknowledged;
relevant conflicts of interest have been disclosed; and
the submitted work complies with applicable research and publication-ethics standards.
The journal reserves the right to investigate any suspected violation of these principles and to take appropriate action in accordance with its policies, applicable regulations, and established standards of publication ethics.
The Journal of Modern Research Physics is committed to maintaining the independence, impartiality, and integrity of its peer review and editorial decision-making processes and therefore avoids excessive concentration of articles authored by individuals affiliated with the journal.
In the two most recent issues of the journal, articles in which at least one author is the Editor-in-Chief, an Editorial Board member, or a reviewer of the journal must not account for more than 25% of the total research articles published.
Manuscripts authored by the Editor-in-Chief, Editorial Board members, or reviewers are subject to an independent double-blind peer review process. Individuals with a potential conflict of interest are excluded from the peer review and final decision-making process concerning their own manuscripts.
This policy is implemented to prevent conflicts of interest, maintain the independence of the peer review process, and uphold professional standards of scholarly publishing.